<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cathartic Relief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darwinator.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Better out than in</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on We fight for freedom &#8211; or &#8220;What if someone else did it to us?&#8221; by Trading Places, Changing Perspectives - Subzero Blue</title>
		<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/we-hope-for-freedom/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Trading Places, Changing Perspectives - Subzero Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/we-hope-for-freedom/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>[...] Very worth the read, check it out here: We fight for freedom - or “What if someone else did it to us?”. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Very worth the read, check it out here: We fight for freedom &#8211; or “What if someone else did it to us?”. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama&#8217;s win &#8220;rejiggers&#8221; the race, or does it? by Dai Dreamer</title>
		<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/01/27/obamas-win-rejiggers-the-race-or-does-it/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Dai Dreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwinator.wordpress.com/?p=69#comment-270</guid>
		<description>The media is balantly consevative..alot of people are behind crossed doors..swearing and cursing...their minds are still trapped in the 50&#039;s or 60&#039;s...maybe the 70&#039;s , 80&#039;s, or 90&#039;s...but this is the new millenium...the Black and white issue is damn near passe..hispanics and asians outnumber both races 3 to 1...there are so many kids from mixed parentage out there...the world is blending....pretty soon, we all be just people..instead of black, white, asian, or latino.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media is balantly consevative..alot of people are behind crossed doors..swearing and cursing&#8230;their minds are still trapped in the 50&#8217;s or 60&#8217;s&#8230;maybe the 70&#8217;s , 80&#8217;s, or 90&#8217;s&#8230;but this is the new millenium&#8230;the Black and white issue is damn near passe..hispanics and asians outnumber both races 3 to 1&#8230;there are so many kids from mixed parentage out there&#8230;the world is blending&#8230;.pretty soon, we all be just people..instead of black, white, asian, or latino.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama&#8217;s speech on race &#8211; CNN&#8217;s pathetic headline by michelle aguilar</title>
		<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/03/18/obamas-speech-on-race-cnns-pathetic-headline/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>michelle aguilar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwinator.wordpress.com/?p=91#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Brilliant speech???? You gotta be kiddin.  This was as politically motivated as you can get.  It might have meant something if he had made the speech at the beginning of his campaign and throughout.  What a manipulator.  They better add an asterisk after this speech.  POLITICALLY MOTIVATED, WRITTEN UNDER DURESS TO SAVE HIS POLITICAL *ss.
VIVA HILLARY.  P.S. B.Richardson doesn&#039;t speak for many Hispanics.  Guess if you can&#039;t get the prez nomination, V-P is just as good.  Way to go, MURTHA for supporting Hillary.  Speeches at an anti-war rally don&#039;t count if you&#039;re going to compare yourself to U.S. Senators who had to vote weighing all the information they were given.  Until you walk in their shoes, BO, your speech doesn&#039;t mean beans.  HOW WOULD YOU HAVE VOTED???  LIKE HRC?  KERRY?  EDWARDS? DIDN&#039;T YOU VOTE TO FUND THE WAR AFTER YOU BECAME US SENATOR???  HAVEN&#039;T YOU VOTED JUST LIKE HRC SINCE YOU BECAME US SENATOR?  BO IS ALL BEEF CAKES AND NO BEEF.  GIVE ME SUBSTANCE, GIVE ME SOMEONE I KNOW.  VIVA HILLARY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant speech???? You gotta be kiddin.  This was as politically motivated as you can get.  It might have meant something if he had made the speech at the beginning of his campaign and throughout.  What a manipulator.  They better add an asterisk after this speech.  POLITICALLY MOTIVATED, WRITTEN UNDER DURESS TO SAVE HIS POLITICAL *ss.<br />
VIVA HILLARY.  P.S. B.Richardson doesn&#8217;t speak for many Hispanics.  Guess if you can&#8217;t get the prez nomination, V-P is just as good.  Way to go, MURTHA for supporting Hillary.  Speeches at an anti-war rally don&#8217;t count if you&#8217;re going to compare yourself to U.S. Senators who had to vote weighing all the information they were given.  Until you walk in their shoes, BO, your speech doesn&#8217;t mean beans.  HOW WOULD YOU HAVE VOTED???  LIKE HRC?  KERRY?  EDWARDS? DIDN&#8217;T YOU VOTE TO FUND THE WAR AFTER YOU BECAME US SENATOR???  HAVEN&#8217;T YOU VOTED JUST LIKE HRC SINCE YOU BECAME US SENATOR?  BO IS ALL BEEF CAKES AND NO BEEF.  GIVE ME SUBSTANCE, GIVE ME SOMEONE I KNOW.  VIVA HILLARY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Democratic nomination &#8211; what happens next? by Austin</title>
		<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/democratic-nomination-what-happens-next/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwinator.wordpress.com/?p=89#comment-260</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not political at all. I believe that no matter who gets in office there will be a great failing of the people. However, this particular race is interesting because of it&#039;s historic significance so I&#039;ve been all over it. When have we ever gotten a woman this far in the race and a black man this far in the race so close to the same time as the first female speaker of the house? This is an amazing time which is why I&#039;m watching the race. Do I believe in anyone running on either side of the political coin? No, but I do recognize the historical significance of this race. It&#039;s been quite interesting to watch. What will be even more interesting is exactly how well O does in Indiana. That will be interesting to me.

Austin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not political at all. I believe that no matter who gets in office there will be a great failing of the people. However, this particular race is interesting because of it&#8217;s historic significance so I&#8217;ve been all over it. When have we ever gotten a woman this far in the race and a black man this far in the race so close to the same time as the first female speaker of the house? This is an amazing time which is why I&#8217;m watching the race. Do I believe in anyone running on either side of the political coin? No, but I do recognize the historical significance of this race. It&#8217;s been quite interesting to watch. What will be even more interesting is exactly how well O does in Indiana. That will be interesting to me.</p>
<p>Austin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know who predicted today&#8217;s results pretty well?  The Obama campaign by Edmund</title>
		<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/you-know-who-predicted-todays-results-pretty-well-the-obama-campaign/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwinator.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-258</guid>
		<description>While the popular vote is important we must look at the states as essentially being 1 vote each. Barack has won 28 states so far, that is a telling number</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the popular vote is important we must look at the states as essentially being 1 vote each. Barack has won 28 states so far, that is a telling number</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know who predicted today&#8217;s results pretty well?  The Obama campaign by Justin</title>
		<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/you-know-who-predicted-todays-results-pretty-well-the-obama-campaign/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwinator.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-256</guid>
		<description>As an independant who is backing obama...I want to say that no matter who is on top..the super&#039;s need to stay the hell out of it and let the voice of the people stay as is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an independant who is backing obama&#8230;I want to say that no matter who is on top..the super&#8217;s need to stay the hell out of it and let the voice of the people stay as is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know who predicted today&#8217;s results pretty well?  The Obama campaign by msa4</title>
		<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/you-know-who-predicted-todays-results-pretty-well-the-obama-campaign/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>msa4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwinator.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-254</guid>
		<description>The delegate count is crucial, and the Obama team has been doing an excellent job.  But there are some who say that the popular vote is equally important.  Although this seems to make sense, there are problems with the idea of a national popular vote.   

I try to explain why at  http://msa4.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The delegate count is crucial, and the Obama team has been doing an excellent job.  But there are some who say that the popular vote is equally important.  Although this seems to make sense, there are problems with the idea of a national popular vote.   </p>
<p>I try to explain why at  <a href="http://msa4.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://msa4.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know who predicted today&#8217;s results pretty well?  The Obama campaign by shwee</title>
		<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/you-know-who-predicted-todays-results-pretty-well-the-obama-campaign/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>shwee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwinator.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;m a clinton supporter so it&#039;s nice to see she is catching up to Obama. Looks like the race for presidency is going to drag on a little longer though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;m a clinton supporter so it&#8217;s nice to see she is catching up to Obama. Looks like the race for presidency is going to drag on a little longer though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know who predicted today&#8217;s results pretty well?  The Obama campaign by The Presidential Candidates</title>
		<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/you-know-who-predicted-todays-results-pretty-well-the-obama-campaign/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>The Presidential Candidates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 04:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwinator.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-251</guid>
		<description>The reality of the situation is that Obama&#039;s chances of finishing ahead of Clinton in the pledged delegate count actually raised yesterday as it was essentially a wash and Obama had a solid lead going into it. 

The perception though is that Clinton had a big comeback victory. That perception is the real problem, not the reality. 

The thing is, at this point, it&#039;s clear to me that Clinton knows she cannot win the pledged delegate count, they just want to get a bit closer and finish out with some wins so that they can get the Superdelegates behind them and steal this nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reality of the situation is that Obama&#8217;s chances of finishing ahead of Clinton in the pledged delegate count actually raised yesterday as it was essentially a wash and Obama had a solid lead going into it. </p>
<p>The perception though is that Clinton had a big comeback victory. That perception is the real problem, not the reality. </p>
<p>The thing is, at this point, it&#8217;s clear to me that Clinton knows she cannot win the pledged delegate count, they just want to get a bit closer and finish out with some wins so that they can get the Superdelegates behind them and steal this nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You know who predicted today&#8217;s results pretty well?  The Obama campaign by tommy paine</title>
		<link>http://darwinator.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/you-know-who-predicted-todays-results-pretty-well-the-obama-campaign/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwinator.wordpress.com/?p=88#comment-249</guid>
		<description>it looks Texas is going BETTER than the Obama estimators projected, not worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it looks Texas is going BETTER than the Obama estimators projected, not worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
